A new option has been added to the list of open source headless content management systems (CMS). Will it be a better alternative to headless WordPress? Source: // linux.cn/article-14660- 1.html Author: Jacob Crume Translator: Six out of the box
(Number of words in this article: 1417, reading duration: about 2 minutes)
A new option has been added to the list of open source headless content management systems (CMS). Will it be a better alternative to headless WordPress?
Since the first beta version was released more than a year ago, as a headless content management system (CMS), Payload has gradually impressed people in the Web development community. First of all, let's give some background introduction. Payload is a content management system specifically tailored for simpler development of websites, Web applications or native applications.
Recently, they decided to open source completely. Now, it has become one of the Best available open source content management system one of.
However, this also brings some questions: what kind of business model will they adopt? What are the plans for the Payload content management system? Now, let's have a brief look!
Why is Payload open source?
Since its first release in 2021, Payload has received many contributions from the open source community. Just like Payload in them Recent announcements As mentioned in, open source is an important decision. It can make the project reach a higher level, which is impossible to do behind closed doors.
In addition, this openness often increases the trust of the developer community. This trust will also extend to business, and naturally become the most supported and trusted platform for developers.
Therefore, Payload is switching to MIT license. This will allow anyone to modify, distribute and use Payload free of charge and without restrictions.
However, Payload still needs capital inflow to continue its operation. So, this leads to the question, how will Payload make a profit?
How will Payload be profitable?
As usual, Payload needs some financial support to maintain its operations. The team came up with a two-part plan, which not only provides users with more convenience centered functions, but also provides self hosted customers with incredible flexibility.
Enterprise License
This option is very similar to other open source CMS software services. These licenses will provide more advanced SSO options and ensure the response time of Payload core team for developers.
These licenses should be attractive to large companies, especially those that need maximum reliability.
Virtual machine
This option is very attractive because it combines multiple services to create the most convenient experience. Although traditional hosting is still quite easy, as long as you add databases, persistent file storage and other infrastructure for node applications, you will face four or five different services, which need to work together seamlessly.
It should be noted that this is not necessary, and Payload still encourages users to host their instances. This service simply eliminates the significant costs and challenges associated with hosting.
So far, the matter has not been finalized. However, you can focus on GitHub To track the progress of things.
summary
As an emerging CMS option, I'm glad to see that Payload has taken this step and become a popular alternative to WordPress and other options. In addition, in my opinion, the Payload team is confident in their new business model, which may indicate a bright future (hope so).
Payload content management system
via: // news.itsfoss.com/payloa d-open-source/
Author: Jacob Crume Topic: lkxed translator: lkxed Checked by: wxy
This article is written by LCTT Original compilation, Linux China Honorable launch
