Simply looking at Web3.0 according to horizontal logic can not really understand the connotation of Web3.0, and will even bring Web3.0 into a development situation similar to Web1.0 and Web2.0. However, this trend is now the mainstream. Many people just regard Web3.0 as an entrance, and really start to implement and practice Web3.0 in the way and method of entrance, eventually turning Web3.0 into a concept similar to Web1.0 and Web2.0.
We can truly grasp the connotation and logic of Web3.0 only when we look at it from a new perspective instead of a horizontal perspective. According to the general understanding, the so-called Web3.0 is actually an existence built on the blockchain technology. In a sense, Web3.0 is a direct manifestation of the future life interpreted by the blockchain for us.
With Web3.0, we can enter a new world dominated by blockchain technology. This seems to be the correct logic for us to understand Web3.0. However, if we are still looking at Web3.0 from a horizontal perspective, but do not really look at the way and method of Web3.0 from a multidimensional perspective, we will not be able to see the full picture of Web3.0, and even will greatly offset the functions and roles of blockchain in it.
In my opinion, the so-called Web3.0 is not just an entrance, but a new world that is more three-dimensional and full than the "entrance". If we regard Web 1.0 as a "nucleus" and Web 2.0 as a "cell body", then Web 3.0 is an "organism".
Web3.0 is not a physical concept
The practice of simply viewing Web3.0 as an entrance is still viewed in the way of physical concepts. The so-called physical concept is actually the same as the internal logic of the Internet. In the Internet era, we enter the world it brings us through "screen". In such a virtual world, we can enjoy shopping, social networking and many other Internet products. Although this method greatly saves time and improves efficiency, it is always a virtual world.
The so-called virtual world is actually untouchable. In essence, the virtual world built by the Internet is the same as the real world. They all meet people's needs in a relatively independent and single world. Although such a single way has improved efficiency and brought convenience to a certain extent, it has also produced many pain points and problems. The series of Internet chaos we have seen is a direct reflection of such a phenomenon.
This shows that only relying on physical concepts and methods can not solve all the pain points and problems of people, and will even bring users into a relatively closed environment. The words "system", "cocoon room" and so on that we see are basically born in this context.
As a "gravedigger" of the physical world, Web3.0 is not only a simple concept of physics, but also a brand new concept that includes many forms. The author believes that it should cover the physical world and the virtual world, as well as the new existence of the digital world and the intelligent world. In the world of Web3.0, what we have achieved is not just the life in the concept of physics, but the concept of transcending physics. What we have achieved is the deep integration of virtual and reality, and the integration of digital and entity. This is a multi-dimensional, three-dimensional and complex new world. Therefore, it is not very accurate to describe and interpret Web3.0 only as an entry.
Web3.0 is not just a single form
Whether it is Web 1.0 or Web 2.0, it is a single form. Based on such a single form, what we have constructed is a world of relative opposition and separation. In fact, there are many "high walls" between different technologies and different commercial entities. What we see in the wars between Internet giants, the relationship between virtual economy and real economy, and the barriers between different technologies are basically the embodiment of such a single form.
As for the definition that Web3.0 is still an entrance, in fact, it has built a high wall invisibly, dividing Web3.0 into internal and external worlds. Although within Web3.0, we can really enjoy the new life brought by the new technology represented by blockchain, what about beyond Web3.0? We still have to experience the traditional and primitive experience. Such a way only breaks the "high wall" between different platforms, and closes the "gap" between them. In fact, it brings Web3.0 into two different environments, "inside" and "outside".
In the final analysis, the definition of Web3.0 by "portal" has also brought it into a state of isolation, confrontation and fragmentation, and has not really achieved integration and integration in a real sense. According to the author's understanding, Web3.0 in its true sense is not just a completely different world inside and outside the "portal", but a new world that is fully integrated and cultivates both inside and outside. Inside and outside of Web3.0, we feel a new world that is exactly the same. In this new world, we not only realize the deep integration of the digital world and the real world, but also realize the vertical and horizontal connection between different technologies, and finally achieve a new world of composition and integration.
The concept of "switching" does not exist in Web3.0
Many people view the metauniverse and Web 3.0 together, and some even believe that the metauniverse is the most appropriate expression in the era of Web 3.0. I don't think so. In my opinion, under the logic of the metauniverse, there is still the concept of "switching" between the virtual world and the real world. If there is still the concept of "switching", then Web3.0 has not been really connected.
In addition, the so-called "switching" still has a concept of "screen" or "entrance". Since such a concept exists, Web3.0 cannot be called Web3.0 in the true sense. According to my understanding, Web3.0 in its true sense should be able to realize its own free shuttle in different environments, different scenes, and free switch in different environments. And such a "shuttle" and "switch" is insensitive and logical.
The concept of "switching" still exists when Web3.0 is only regarded as an entrance. When "handover" still exists, it indicates that the shuttle and handover are "not free", which means that users still have pain points. If we regard such a kind of Web 3.0 as the real Web 3.0, it would be too simple and arbitrary.
The author believes that in the era of Web3.0, the concepts of "screen" and "portal" are ubiquitous. When "screen" and "portal" are ubiquitous, their existence is meaningless. When its existence is no longer meaningful, it is obviously inappropriate to define Web3.0 as an entry.
epilogue
When the development of blockchain begins to mature, especially when the application scenarios of blockchain begin to be connected into a network, we see that the voice of Web3.0 is getting higher and higher. This is a necessity. Through it, we should see more about the coming of the blockchain era.
When more and more attention is focused on Web3.0, we can see that some people begin to define it as an entrance, a "screen". Obviously, this actually brings Web3.0 into a horizontal and independent circle. Just looking at and defining Web3.0 in this way will only lead it to a new dead end.
Jump out of the horizontal and isolated hindrance, and really look at Web3.0 from a new perspective, and see Web3.0 as an existence that realizes the combination of virtual reality, number reality, and the combination of physical space and cyberspace. Only in this way can we truly grasp the essence and core meaning of Web3.0, and can we truly bring Web3.0 into its true and correct development path.
